Microsoft Edge Status_access_violation
(0xC0000005) STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION any idea what caused it?? Or what it exactly is describing?? Internet searches find nothing.
- Statusaccessviolation – Microsoft Edge The first thing you should do is to update Edge to the latest version. Check this by going to Settings Help and Feedback About Microsoft Edge.
- Mar 05, 2020 According to Microsoft’s schedule, Microsoft Edge updates are shipped daily for the Canary build, weekly for the Developer version, and every six weeks for the beta.
Download Microsoft Edge Insider Channels Get Support @MSEdgeDev Microsoft Edge Developer Blog. Microsoft Edge Documentation. Bing Insiders Community @MSBingDev. STATUSACCESSVIOLATION 1; Review failed 1; keygen 1; edgecanary 1; uploadspeed 1; copy urls 1; workspaces 1; passwort 1; extensions-toolbar-menu 1; merge tabs 1; macos.
Message boards : Number crunching : (0xC0000005) STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION any idea what caused it?? Or what it exactly is describing?? Internet searches find nothing.
Message board moderation
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 5 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
| Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 12516 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 | After I brought Numbskull back up this afternoon after being turned off for some room reconfiguration, I discovered that I started to trash about 47 tasks on all the gpus for no apparent reason. It was running fine before I turned the system off. Does anyone know what causes the issue and have a solution for it? I stopped BOINC after I saw the compute errors. I did a sfc /scannow and didn't find any issues as expected. I then decided to do a BOINC repair. That didn't accomplish anything since I was still making errors after a brief BOINC restart. Decided to reinstall the Nvidia drivers. That might have been the trick to getting the errors to stop. Haven't seen any errors since I brought the system and BOINC back online. The system was running fine with no apparent failures. BOINC ran each gpu task to completion with a good exit signal. Just that each task is labelled as a compute error with a system dump appended. Can't find any reference to the error online except to a game called Arma 3. Anyone have any comment or knowledge on the subject? TIA.Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
| Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14344 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 | Anything with the 'shape' like 0xC0000005 is a low-level Microsoft operating system error. Googling it invariably leads to thousands and thousands of dumb questions where the OS threw a whoopsie during the running of this application, that application, or the other application. The motherlode for starting your diagnostics is https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc704588.aspx. In this case, STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION is described as The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.You'll find that in full, with the blanks filled in, in the stderr for the tasks. So, the application that's running is having problems with RAM. If it's an application which has run before, or is running on another machine, 47 consecutive failures points at RAM failure. Test it. |
| Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 12516 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 | Thanks Richard, I looked in Event Viewer for the error and clicked on the 'Help' function which then took me to a invalid Microsoft URL. Thanks for nothing Microsoft. When you say the memory was an issue, are you saying the system memory or the gpu memory? The tasks that were running on the three gpus all errored. None of the cpu tasks errored. I find it hard to believe all three gpus simultaneously had memory issues. There had to be a common connection between all three.Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
| Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14344 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 | I don't think the Microsoft OS has any knowledge of GPU memory: it will be referring to system memory. That page describes a coding file called 'ntstatus.h', which has existed since, well, the beginning of Windows NT. Go up a level, and look at https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc231200.aspx. Your error has severity 'C' (for error), and code 5 (a very, very, early number in the grand scheme of things). It was probably defined in the very first draft of Windows NT. Note the final part of the explanation: 'The memory could not be %s.' That %s could be replaced by 'written' - it could be a security protection error. I suggested testing RAM because it's relatively easy for the end-user to do, but from what you've said now, I agree it's less likely to be the problem. Is that machine up-to-date with security patches? |
| Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 12516 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 | Well I just made two more errors. This time on the cpu. So I am running a stress test on the memory now. It is up to date on security patches as far as I can tell. Only get the monthly rollups automatically.Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
| Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 12516 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 | I just made a 300% coverage memory stress test on all 16GB on all cores and didn't have any errors. I have not blue-screened or system errored yet. I don't see any WHEA errors either. I reseated the RAM in case picking the case up and moving it yesterday while building the new desk jostled anything. I have no idea what else to try other than going into the BIOS and detuning every memory parameter back to JEDEC 2133.Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
| Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 12516 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 | Still getting errors and I finally did just get a memory blue screen. So the system is not happy with the memory now for some reason. Failing memory or the new cpu? I just threw the memory settings back to stock DDR4-2400 for Ryzen and see if that makes any difference.Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
| Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 27823 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 | Still getting errors and I finally did just get a memory blue screen. So the system is not happy with the memory now for some reason. Failing memory or the new cpu? I just threw the memory settings back to stock DDR4-2400 for Ryzen and see if that makes any difference. Yes. Possible it didn't like the hot-cold-hot cycle and internally a chip has an intermittent fault from thermal expansion/contraction. If you have an extra known good stick of ram you could try swapping it and seeing if you can find the bad one. |
| Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 12516 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 | Been trying to find the post by AMD saying the IMC doesn't like temps lower than 20° C. I had the window open in the room as usual for cooling and the cold north breeze dropped the water temp down to 17° C. I am wondering if that could possibly be the reason for the errors. Never usually worry about too low temps, certainly the opposite with all computers running and daytime outside temps greater than 75° F. and the house and room temps start going past 82° F. I've run for about an hour now with no further errors at 2400. Will bump it up a notch and see if it still stays stable and no errors.Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
| Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 12516 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 | I think something in Windows got corrupted even though the sfc /scannow showed no issues. I rebooted the system after changing some BIOS values and Windows went to Automated Repair which it failed at repeatedly for several hours of me trying everything to get the system back. Finally decided I would just reinstall Windows and at least get a running OS again. Somehow that got botched too but it did present my original Windows installation to me again with no loss of data. Never had to deal with a unbootable Win 10 system before and never had to use any of the recovery options. They don't work all that well it seems. Wouldn't even use my System Image and Restore point on another separate physical drive. I actually had started installation of Linux and was going to pull the plug on Windows10, but changed my mind and decided to try the complete reinstall of Windows 10.Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
| Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 27823 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 | Been trying to find the post by AMD saying the IMC doesn't like temps lower than 20° C. I had the window open in the room as usual for cooling and the cold north breeze dropped the water temp down to 17° C. I am wondering if that could possibly be the reason for the errors. Never usually worry about too low temps, certainly the opposite with all computers running and daytime outside temps greater than 75° F. and the house and room temps start going past 82° F. Wasn't talking about running temps, but while off, the entire rig goes to room and then you turn it on and it goes to hot. Big change. Can cause the less than hair size wires inside the chip case to go sprong. But I see you did a reinstall and things seem happy. Hope they stay happy. |
| Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15182 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 | I always found 0xC0000005 very difficult to trace. Have even got a BOINC FAQ for it, which may or may not give pointers, because this is such a difficult error to trace. |
| Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 12516 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 | I think that Gary is on to something. The system had been powered on ever since I replaced the cpu and hadn't been turned off until Saturday when I shut down both computers in the room for rebuilding a desk surface sufficient to handle another system. It never came back the same. Been unstable ever since. The other identical system (more or less) just powered up like nothing happened and is running the same as before. The system with the new cpu won't run at anything other than box stock. It corrupted the operating system. I checked the RAM and verified the CRC's and SPD settings to be sure the memory hadn't been corrupted. Everything is pointing to the IMC in the CPU going bad. The only way to know for sure is to replace the cpu again. I will have to purchase another chip as I don't want to go through the AMD RMA process again without advance shipment. If I can just ride this one out for another month and a half I would just buy the new 2700X cpu and replace the bad 1700 cpu through the usual AMD RMA process since I won't be time constrained.Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
| Karsten Vinding Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 239 Credit: 25,201,931 RAC: 11 | I have to ask, mostly because I have had similar problems recently myself...: Did you upgrade your BIOS about the time where you moved the PC? I have had problems since I upgraded my BIOS from ver 3401 (AGESA 1071) to 3803 (AGESA 1000a). My board is the ASUS TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING. The system became unstable and would crash. There was no regularity to the crashes. They happened at stock, overclocked, sometimes after few minutes sometimes the system would run for days. But it allways crashed with a blue screen, never just froze. As a last resort i set my ram to 2400MHz. My ram is Ryzen certified DDR 3200 (G.Skill FlareX), which I have been running at 3200 since day one without problems. But setting it to 2400 MHz removed the crashes. I have been reading up on the problem, and its a known problem with the latest AGESA that it breaks some RAM (others get better). And if the ram is unstable peoble have seen corruption of their OS'es. I am a little irritated that my, rather expensive, ram is now running below spech, but at least my system is now stable. I'll wait for a fix, mostly because a downgrade is not really very straight forward on my board. |
| Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 12516 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 | I had been running the 3803 BIOS since it came out, so about 1 1/2 months. I only lost my ability to use 3333Mhz and had to fall back to 3200Mhz. Same memory timings mostly and still at CL14. The memory was happier at much less voltage as well as with the SoC voltage with the 3803 BIOS. No, I did not upgrade my BIOS at the time I shut off the computer for 4 hours. I think I have been reading the same in the forums, Hynix memory got better at the detriment to Samsung memory. I was up every couple of hours during the night checking on my latest adjustments to get the system stable again. That along with constantly adjusting all evening beforehand trying to find stability after I brought the system back up. The system is blue-screening in the ntoskernel. I have had to drop back to stock latency timings at only 3000Mhz for the memory and also drop the cpu core clock down to 3.8Ghz from the normal 3.95Ghz. I sure hope they release a better AGESA BIOS soon.Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
| Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 27823 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 | I think that Gary is on to something. The system had been powered on ever since I replaced the cpu and hadn't been turned off until Saturday when I shut down both computers in the room for rebuilding a desk surface sufficient to handle another system. It never came back the same. Been unstable ever since. The other identical system (more or less) just powered up like nothing happened and is running the same as before. The system with the new cpu won't run at anything other than box stock. It corrupted the operating system. I checked the RAM and verified the CRC's and SPD settings to be sure the memory hadn't been corrupted. Everything is pointing to the IMC in the CPU going bad. The only way to know for sure is to replace the cpu again. I will have to purchase another chip as I don't want to go through the AMD RMA process again without advance shipment. If I can just ride this one out for another month and a half I would just buy the new 2700X cpu and replace the bad 1700 cpu through the usual AMD RMA process since I won't be time constrained. They have cans of freeze spray for testing just such things. https://www.techspray.com/electronic-testing Been through that once or twice. Just guessing in your case, but easy to test. Also possible to have fractured a trace on the MB in replacing the CPU. Been through that also. A memtest came back saying it all had failed. Knew that the problem wasn't the RAM. |
| Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 12516 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 | Well I am still getting occasional (0xC0000005) STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION errors just about every day. I have downclocked both the cpu and memory and still getting errors. I think the new cpu is the culprit. I think is a duff cpu. Considering it was a RMA replacement for a perfectly working chip with only the theoretical seg fault issue, I think it was a mistake to RMA my first cpu. I wonder if I just got someone else's RMA of a duff chip in return. The only way to prove anything is to replace the chip with another and see if the problem persists. I would then have to look at motherboard or memory degradation as possibilities. So unless I want to take the system down and wait for another RMA'd cpu or I wait out a couple more months with the daily errors while waiting for the Ryzen+ cpus to arrive and spend some out of pocket money for a new retail cpu.Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
| Siran d'Vel'nahr Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 7364 Credit: 44,181,323 RAC: 238 | I wonder if I just got someone else's RMA of a duff chip in return. Hi Keith, I've been watching a lot of PC build YouTube videos from a guy that has a business, for over 25 years, building and maintaining PCs for companies. He has mentioned several times that getting a bad CPU is very, very rare. He says it is possible, but then anything is possible. I don't remember him ever saying that he got a bad CPU for any of his builds. He says that if everything done diagnostically falls down to just the motherboard, CPU and PSU that more than likely it's either mobo or PSU. If the PSU is eliminated, more than like it is the mobo. If you are one of the unlucky ones to get a bad CPU and the RMA replacement turns out to be an RMA from someone else, I would change vendors, after settling up with the current vendor that is. :) Did the RMA CPU you got come in a factory sealed package? If it did, then I would suspect the mobo if all else has been diagnostically eliminated. If it didn't, I would get my money back from the vendor and get the CPU from somewhere else. CPUs cannot be fixed! I highly doubt that the vendor can factory seal a package. To me, a vendor sending out an RMA item from another of their customers is unscrupulous, especially something like a CPU. They would lose my business in a heart beat. :) Just some food for thought. :) SiranCAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr XO - L L & P _// USS Vre'kasht NCC-33187 Winders 10 OS? 'What a piece of junk!' - L. Skywalker 'Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide.' - T'Plana-hath |
| Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 12516 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 | Well I would argue that cpus don't degrade or die. Case in point. My brand new 6850K lasted all of 5 days. It died yesterday with no warning. Machine was running just fine crunching all cpu tasks because it had run through all the gpu tasks, went to take the trash cans to the curb and came back to a powered off computer. Q-code 00 on the display and cpu diagnostic led lit on the mobo. Took the AIO cold plate off the cpu, pulled the chip and put back in the Xeon E5-2620V4 and the system powered right back up from where it left of. Dead cpu - no question. The RMA was direct from AMD through their Support Team. I changed the chip because pre-week 25 chips ( mine was week 7) had a manufacturing flaw that caused segmentation violation faults when heavily loaded like when crunching. The replacement chip was factory sealed and week 38. But the system never behaved the same right from the start with the new cpu. Wouldn't run the clock and memory speeds that the first chip ran without issues and the newer chips were supposed to be able to reach higher speeds at less voltage than the early chips because of process improvements since the early production runs. That is what others that replaced their defective chips had reported.Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
| Karsten Vinding Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 239 Credit: 25,201,931 RAC: 11 | As a followup, yesterday I installed the just released 3805 BIOS for my board. I have set mem back to DOCP3200, and have been running the sytem since then without crashes. Its still early days, as I did have uptimes at above 1 day on 3803 and DOCP3200, but most times it crashed within minutes. So it _seems_ the 3805 BIOS is an improvement, at least in my setup. |
©2021 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.
Instructions
Special offer. See more information about Outbyteuninstall instructionsEULAPrivacy Policy
The following steps may fix the status_access_violation issue:
- Step 1.Download PC Repair application Special offer. See more information about Outbyteuninstall instructionsEULAPrivacy Policy
- Step 2.Install and launch the application
- Step 3.Click the Scan Now button to detect issues and abnormalities
- Step 4.Click the Repair All button to fix the issues
| Compatibility | Win 10, 8, 7 |
| Download Size | 21.2 MB |
| Requirements | 300 MHz Processor, 256 MB RAM, 50 MB HDD |
Limitations: trial version offers an unlimited number of scans, backups and restores of your Windows system elements for free. Registration for the full version starts from USD 29.95.
Installation: When you install software, it gives our advertisers a chance to speak to you. ALL OFFERS ARE OPTIONAL. There is no obligation to accept. Simply choose to decline the offer if you are not interested. If you are interested and choose to accept, you’ll help us to offer more software in the future. Again, there is no obligation to accept any offers. You have the option to decline all advertisements and still install and use the software for free.
Web Companion is your first line of defence. With hundreds of thousands of new virus strands created every day, Ad-Aware Web Companion is the perfect complement to your antivirus and web browser security.
A malfunction reported by 'error code status_access_violation' may happen due to a number of different factors. The most common causes include incorrectly configured system settings or irregular entries in the system elements, to name a few. Such issues may be resolved with special software that repairs system elements and tunes system settings to restore stability.
Apa Yang Dimaksud Dengan Microsoft Edge
The article provides details on what the issue means, potential causes, and ways to resolve the issue.
Meaning of the 'error code status_access_violation'
'Error code status_access_violation' is an issue name that usually contains details of the malfunction, including why it occurred, which system component or application malfunctioned, along with some other information. The numerical code in the issue name usually contains data that can be deciphered by the manufacturer of the component or application that malfunctioned. The issue with using this code may occur in many different locations within the system, so even though it carries some details in its name, it is still difficult for a user to pinpoint and fix the issue cause without specific technical knowledge or appropriate software.
Causes of the 'error code status_access_violation'
If you have received this warning on your PC, it means that there was a malfunction in your system operation. 'Error code status_access_violation' is one of the issues that users get as a result of the incorrect or failed installation or uninstallation of software that may have left invalid entries in your system elements, improper system shutdown due to a power failure or another factor, someone with little technical knowledge accidentally deleting a necessary system file or system element entry, as well as a number of other causes.
Error Status Access Violation
Ways to repair the 'error code status_access_violation'
For an immediate fix of such issues, advanced PC users may be able to repair it by manually editing system elements, and others may want to hire a technician to do it for them. However, since any manipulations with Windows system elements always carry a risk of rendering the operating system unbootable, whenever a user is in any doubt of their technical skills or knowledge, they may use a special type of software that is meant to repair Windows system elements without requiring any special skills from the user.
The following steps may help fix the issue:
- Download PC Repair application Special offer. See more information about Outbyteuninstall instructionsEULAPrivacy Policy
- Install and launch the application
- Click the Scan Now button to detect potential issue causes
- Click the Repair All button to fix found abnormalities
Microsoft Edge For Windows 7
The same application can be used to run preventative measures to reduce the chance of this or other system issues appearing in the future.